Non-Precision Approach
Non-Precision Approach
Description
A non-precision approach is an instrument approach and landing which utilises lateral guidance but does not utilise vertical guidance. (ICAO Annex 6)
Non-precision approaches which are pilot-interpreted make use of ground beacons and aircraft equipment such as VHF Omnidirectional Radio Range (VOR), Non-Directional Beacon and the LLZ element of an ILS system, often in combination with Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) for range. Lateral guidance is provided by a display of either bearing to/from a radio beacon on the approach track or at the airfield or, in the case of an LLZ only approach, by display of the relative position of the LLZ track on the aircraft ILS instruments and vertical guidance is based on the range from the airfield as indicated by a DME at the airfield or on track or by timing based upon passage overhead radio beacons on the track described by the designated procedure.
Non-precision approaches are often conducted with less use of automated systems than precision approaches. However, on many modern aircraft, automatic systems may be left engaged until reaching the Minimum Descent Altitude/Height, or beyond.
For pilots of older aircraft, in which use of automated systems to assist in flying the approach is limited, a high degree of piloting skill is required to fly such approaches accurately and the frequent practice which many pilots need to achieve this can be difficult to come by if precision approaches are the normal method used.
A high proportion of Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accidents have been shown to occur during non-precision approaches. This is in part a result of loss of situational awareness, e.g. resulting in descent before the initial approach fix; and in part a consequence of the lack of precise vertical guidance, which may involve leveling off at intermediate points between the initial approach fix and MDA/H (a step-down approach).
The Continuous Descent Final Approach (CDFA) technique has been promoted in order to mitigate the risks inherent in the standard step-down approach. This procedure may be further simplified in use by the vertical navigation (VNAV) feature of Flight Management System.
An example of a non-precision approach procedure is illustrated below.

Other instrument approaches which utilise lateral and vertical guidance but do not meet the requirements established for precision approach and landing operations are also classified as non-precision approaches. Examples are a Surveillance Radar Approach (SRA) or a VDF approach.
See also Aerodrome Operating Minima (AOM).
Further Reading
- Air Pilots - Commercial Air Transport SAFETY BRIEFING NOTE 05: Non-Precision Approach using Ground Aids; November 2021.
- ICAO Annex 6;
Flight Safety Foundation
The Flight Safety Foundation ALAR Toolkit provides useful training information and guides to best practice. Copies of the FSF ALAR Toolkit may be ordered from the Flight Safety Foundation ALAR website http://www.flightsafety.org/current-safety-initiatives/approach-and-landing-accident-reduction-alar
What Links Here (67)
- Aerodrome Operating Minima (AOM)
- Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP)
- Localiser (LOC) and Localiser Type Directional Aid (LDA) Approaches
- Minimum Descent Altitude/Height (MDA/MDH)
- Non-Directional Beacon
- Operations Manual (OM)
- Runway Visual Range (RVR)
- Side-step Manoeuvre
- VHF Omnidirectional Radio Range (VOR)
- A320, vicinity Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2003
- T154, vicinity Svalbard Norway, 1996
- SW4, vicinity Lockhart River Queensland Australia, 2005
- JS31, Skien Norway, 2001
- A320, Khartoum Sudan, 2005
- B739, Akita Japan, 2007
- A306, vicinity Birmingham AL USA, 2013
- AT72, vicinity Pakse Laos, 2013
- SW4, Sanikiluaq Nunavut Canada, 2012
- B738, vicinity Porto Portugal, 2015
- H25B, vicinity Akron OH USA, 2015
- SW4, vicinity Red Lake ON Canada, 2013
- B738, vicinity Trivandrum India, 2015
- A320, Halifax NS Canada, 2015
- B738, Mildura VIC Australia, 2013
- B737, Mildura VIC Australia, 2013
- DH8D, Hubli India, 2015
- A306, Yerevan Armenia, 2015
- B734, Lahore Pakistan, 2015
- B733, vicinity Kosrae Micronesia, 2015
- JS41, Rhodes Greece, 2015
- A319, Rio de Janeiro Galeão Brazil, 2017
- SB20, vicinity Billund Denmark, 2015
- WW24, vicinity Norfolk Island South Pacific, 2009
- B738, vicinity Denpasar Bali Indonesia, 2013
- CFIT Precursors and Defences
- Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
- Lessening the Effects of Visual Illusions
- Visual References
- Airspace and Procedure Design
- Top 10 Stabilised Approach Considerations for Air Traffic Controllers
- Missed Approach
- Runway Visual Perspective
- Rejected Landings
- Pilot Handling Skills
- Approach and Landing Risks
- Continuous Descent Final Approach (CDFA)
- Flight Safety Foundation ALAR Toolkit
- Required Navigation Performance (RNP)
- Approach Path Monitor
- CFIT After Aborted VOR-DME Approach (OGHFA SE)
- Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
- Flight Management System
- Head Up Display (HUD)
- Impaired Judgment, Decision Making and Flying Skills due to Fatigue (OGHFA SE)
- Information Processing
- Pilot judgment and expertise (OGHFA BN)
- Press-on-itis (OGHFA BN)
- Transition to Visual Flight at Night (OGHFA SE)
- Instrument Landing System (ILS)
- SE003: Precision-Like Approaches - Vertical Angles
- SE007: Precision-Like Approaches - Area Navigation (RNAV) Required Navigation Performance (RNP)
- B738, vicinity Bristol UK, 2019
- A320, Pristina Kosovo, 2017
- A320, vicinity Birmingham UK, 2019
- B738, vicinity Lanzarote Spain, 2019
- AN26, vicinity Birmingham UK, 2020
- VHF Direction Finding (VDF)






